Thousands of pages exist, but only a fraction earn traffic
Generated pages go live at scale, yet search engines only trust or surface a small subset of what was created.
Programmatic SEO
If thousands of pages are being generated without clear quality, indexation, or internal linking rules, we help turn the system into something search engines can actually trust.
For teams generating pages at scale who need quality controls, indexation rules, and repeatable monitoring.
Primary focus areas
Recognition signals
Programmatic SEO underperforms when the page system grows faster than the quality controls, internal linking logic, and indexation rules supporting it.
Generated pages go live at scale, yet search engines only trust or surface a small subset of what was created.
Pages look different by URL, but not different enough in data, content, or usefulness to deserve strong indexation.
The system publishes pages, but fails to reinforce the clusters and landing pages that should carry demand.
Either everything is exposed and low-value URLs flood the index, or strong pages stay buried and never earn coverage.
Thin, missing, or inconsistent inputs scale across the system and suppress performance across whole templates.
How it works
We diagnose the page system first, then decide which cohorts should be strengthened, controlled, or stopped.
Source data, templates, URL rules, and the cohorts being generated.
Thin pages, duplicate cohorts, weak variation, indexation waste, and buried opportunities.
Strengthen, consolidate, control, or remove page groups based on search value and risk.
Evidence we use
Cohorts
Compare template groups rather than isolated examples.
Templates
Check whether generated pages create meaningful differentiation.
Links
Find where important generated URLs are orphaned or buried.
What we actually look at
A review of the structures, rules, and recurring weaknesses affecting performance across the generated estate.
Evidence and proof
For large programmatic page sets, proof usually lives in cohort behaviour: indexation, crawl distribution, template quality, and query movement.
Featured project
Anna Davies shows how catalogue data and Search Console evidence can reveal repeated template issues and prioritise product and collection fixes in batches, rather than chasing individual URLs one by one.
3,289
Active products with weak or missing SEO metadata
649
Active products with imported HTML clutter
1,725
Active in-stock products identified as actionable opportunities
Problem
Thousands of small catalogue gaps spread across products, collections, and historical content.
Action
Connected Shopify and Search Console, then shipped repeatable product and collection updates in batches.
Result
A prioritised opportunity backlog for catalogue improvements by data and commercial relevance.
Recent work built around repeated visibility failures

Project example
Large catalogue SEO prioritisation
View project context →Diagnosis file #001
Problem
Thousands of live Shopify products were discoverable, but only a small share were indexed.
Diagnosis
Faceted URLs, weak internal links, and uneven template quality were pulling crawl attention away from priority products.
Outcome
Crawl attention returned to core pages; index coverage stabilised.
Diagnostic entry points
Start with the symptom you can see. The service work then traces that symptom back to the page, template, crawl, or content system causing it.
Symptom
Large sites often underperform because Google spends time on the wrong URLs.
Symptom
Programmatic pages fail to get indexed when the system produces URLs faster than quality, usefulness, and internal linking can support them.
Symptom
Crawl budget is the number of pages Google will crawl on your site in a given period.
Symptom
Canonical tags tell search engines which URL is the preferred version of a page.
Reference material
These are deeper reference pages for the systems and technical decisions behind programmatic seo.
Guide
Plan programmatic page sets with stronger templates, indexation controls, and internal linking that works across large sites.
Guide
Diagnose why only part of a large website is being indexed. Use Search Console, sitemaps, crawl patterns, and template analysis.
Guide
How to focus crawl budget on important pages. Sitemaps, internal links, and low-value URL control.
Outputs
The output is designed for decisions and implementation, not for filling a report with every possible SEO issue.
A ranked view of the template, data, and indexation issues holding the page system back.
We define what belongs in the index, what needs improving, and what should be kept out.
Specific improvements for the structures and inputs that affect performance at scale.
If needed, we can help work through the template changes, rollout sequence, and monitoring setup.
It is most valuable when repeated templates, structured data inputs, or large page sets influence how the site grows in search.
The first useful diagnosis is normally built around a focused evidence pass rather than a long discovery phase. Larger catalogues, generated page systems, and migration issues can take longer because the work needs to be checked by template, URL cohort, and commercial priority.
That depends on the team and platform. We can hand over developer-ready recommendations, work alongside an internal SEO or development team, or support implementation where the fixes need closer technical interpretation.
Yes. Better Ranking is often most useful as the diagnostic and prioritisation layer: identifying the cause, setting the fix order, and helping existing teams focus on the changes most likely to move search performance.
If scaled page systems are weakly controlled, they absorb crawl attention and opportunity without delivering the traffic they promise.
Commercial next step
Get a clear view of which generated pages should scale, which should be controlled, and what the template system needs next.
Diagnose the page system